Posted by: WCFN | February 28, 2013

A Scoop on windfarm politics in France


A French MP dares!

village en France

Wind turbines close to habitations

A member of the French conservative party UPM, François Vannson, condemns “laisser faire” windfarm policies and demands that sustainable development principles be respected as part of the energy transition.


*                                        *                                      *


WCFN commends Member of Parliament François Vannson.


The French political class seems to have buried the Environment Code, an essential piece of legislation. We thank Mr. Vannson for unearthing it, and with it the respect for nature, biodiversity, and the quality of landscapes they infer.

We also thank him for his interest in preserving the health and well being of populations. The rest of the political class ignores windfarm victims completely, even denies their existence. The sufferings of windfarm neighbors – and even their deaths – Click here – are the “collateral damages” of a corrupt democracy.


*                                  *                              *


In a written question to the Minister for the Environment, the MP for the Vosges region François Vannson, condemns the inconsistencies within the French government’s wind policy by highlighting discrepancies with sustainable development objectives.

He puts forward a set of specific proposals, including that wind farms be built at no less than 1,500 m from habitations, and that they be banned from forests and protected zones. He also calls for the re-establishment of the “5 mast” rule, the appointment of consultants by an independent authority, and that impact studies consider social cohesion as a factor.

In conclusion, Mr. François Vannson points out that the energy transition cannot be properly managed without the consent of populations based on respect, dialogue and the preservation of natural environments.

These proposals also form part of a call for the controlled development of wind energy, launched by a group of several environmental protection organisations.

After the difficulties involved in passing the Brottes bill in Parliament, this stance from a member of the opposition attests to the growing discontent surrounding the French government’s energy policy.

A response from Minister Delphine Batho is expected.


Here is the full text of the written question to the Minister, as deposited at the French Parliament (Assemblée Nationale):

Mr François Vannson calls the attention of the Minister of Ecology, Sustainable Development and Energy to the dangers of a laisser-faire development policy for wind energy.

Indeed, this renewable energy is only sustainable as long as its development is controlled and monitored by regulations. Industrialists from the wind sector must not be the only ones able to “call the shots”.

As set out in article 19-III of the law of 3rd August 2009, the development of renewable energies must not be to the detriment of other sustainable development objectives. These objectives are set out in article L.110 of the Environment Code, as follows:

-the fight against climate change,
-preservation of biodiversity, ecosystems and resources,
-social cohesion and solidarity between territories and generations,
-the self-fulfillment of all human beings,
-all within a development dynamic that sticks to principles of responsible production and consumption.

In order to comply with these objectives, it is more important than ever to consider elements such as flourishing landscapes, biodiversity and social cohesion – the very elements that the obsession with wind is threatening.

In the same logic, it would be timely to reestablish the 5 mast minimum rule, to go back to defining wind development areas on a local scale as was planned for ZDEs, to revise regional wind plans established without consultation, to include social cohesion in the scope of impact studies, to allow for the appointment of consultants by an authority independent of the project backers, to ensure wind farms are not built in protected zones, to ban the establishment of wind farms in forests and forest edges, and to maintain a minimum precautionary distance of 1,500m from homes.

The energy transition cannot be properly managed without the consent of populations. It must be based on respect, dialogue, and the preservation of natural environments.



Responses

  1. Reblogged this on SMIPP Ltd..

  2. How to empeach a starting massive windfarm project (in the heart of a Wildlife Park in South of France)? First inhabitants had to moove from their homes already because of constant light flashes and infrasounds…

    • It’s very difficult to stop a wind project in France these days. The dice are loaded in favour of developers, and corruption may also rise its ugly head here and there. Democratic rights and the Aarhus convention are being violated left and right, and the European Court of Justice looks the other way.

      But a strong local opposition can succeed in defeating a particular project. Local politicians have to become convinced that they must side with the opponants.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: