Posted by: WCFN | July 10, 2014

Wind turbine infrasound affects OVULATION (Denmark)


… and kills another small business


“All my female employees are complaining of irregular menstruations, and several have permanent headaches.”
(Boye Jensen, nursery owner, Denmark)


Ovulation
For illustration only


The Danish press reports the case of a garden centre (nursery) going out of business because of nearby wind turbines. Headaches are frequent among employees, and female workers complain of unusual bleeding and problems with their menstrual cycles. They are worried that more serious illnesses may follow. Five have recently resigned. The owner is now closing his business for fear of being held liable should a child be born with deformities, as happened to numerous mink puppies at a fur farm near wind turbines in Jutland (1).


Boye Jensen, the owner of Lammefjordens Perennials, is 67. He started his nursery 43 years ago, and it became a prosperous business with 15 employees and annual sales of 12 million krones (equiv. $ 2.1 million). He was planning to continue working for another 6-7 years, then sell the nursery. But his business is now worth nothing, creating an enormous financial loss.

Boye Jensen at his plant nursery
Boye Jensen, the owner of Lammefjordens Perennials



He is discussing with his lawyer whether to sue Vattenfal, the company that owns the wind turbines, or the Municipality of Holbaek, which approved their installation 400-700 metres from his nursery. He expects to go to court and seek damages worth several million krones.


Himself a neighbour to 127-metre high wind turbines since their installation three years ago, Boye Jensen has long been convinced that low frequency noise emitted by the turbines makes people ill as they do animals” (2). Then, recently, he heard the tragic news from Kaj Bank Olesen’s mink farms (1). This, along with the resignation of several of his employees for health reasons, made him realise his business had become untenable because of the wind turbines. “The nursery owner made this hard decision after a mink breeder in Jutland was able to establish a causal link between the loss of a third of his mink puppies, deformed or stillborn, and several giant wind turbines erected nearby” (2).

Plant nursery or Garden center Lammefjordens Stauder near Holbæk
Boye Jensen, in his garden center



The story made the news in Denmark (2) (3), and Member of Parliament Karina Adsbøl expressed her concerns to the Minister of Health at a parliamentary hearing. The Minister, typically, replied by addressing other, less important issues mentioned by the MP, and ignored the important ones, i.e. wind turbines causing birth defects in animals forced to live near them, and disrupting women’s menstrual cycles (4).


The World Council for Nature (WCFN) is calling attention to the fact that, as occurred for tobacco, asbestos, thalidomide etc, governments are siding with private financial interests in ignoring or denying the existence of obvious health problems linked to wind turbines. As is the case for the millions of birds and bats killed yearly by the turbines’ blades, mendacious studies are published by unscrupulous consultants, and by professionals and universities happy to oblige their benefactors. Hypocrisy is rampant, species are fast disappearing from our skies, and thousands of windfarm neighbours are being submitted to torture. The word “torture” is not an exaggeration: sleep deprivation is indeed a recognised form of torture.


In Denmark as elsewhere in the world, many rural families are suffering, particularly since the manufacture of the mega turbines (1 MW and over), which emit more infrasound as they grow bigger. This may explain why the complaints are growing louder. How much longer can this suffering be ignored, or even denied by health authorities?

Some countries, including Canada and Australia, have commissioned studies into the matter of noise emitted by windfarms. But the studies’ scope and methodology doom them to failure, perhaps intentionally. What is really needed is:


1) an epidemiological study, and
2) the measurement of low frequency sound (including infrasound down to 0.1 Hz), inside the homes of windfarm victims, at night, windows closed, when the wind is blowing from the direction that is causing the problem.


Most of all, as a precaution, no mega turbines should be erected less than 10 km from habitations until these studies are completed, published and analysed. There is indeed compelling evidence that infrasound travels much farther than other noise, and tortures sensitive people in their homes at distances of 10 km and more. Shorter distances could be temporarily set for smaller turbines, in proportion with their generating capacity.


WCFN calls upon the Danish government to intervene in favour of victims. A wealth of evidence is available, including peer-reviewed studies, that warrants applying the precautionary principle without delay (5). Children are particularly at risk – evidently even the unborn.


WCFN’s primary goal is the conservation of biodiversity. A sane and responsible human population is the single most important means of achieving this goal.  A letter of protest is being sent to the Danish government.



Mark Duchamp
Chairman, World Council for Nature
wcfn@live.com
July 10th 2014


References:


(1) – Kaj Bank Olesen’s mink farm: stillbirths and deformities:https://wcfn.org/2014/06/07/windfarms-1600-miscarriages/


(2) – Translation of the article from the Nordvestnyt (North West News) on the closure of the garden center:https://wcfn.org/documents/wind-turbines-affect-menstruation-danish-press/


(3) – Garden centre story mentioned in one of Denmark’s leading newswpaper, Jyllands-Posten (the Jutland Post):http://jyllands-posten.dk/opinion/breve/ECE6846968/mink-som-forsoegsdyr/


(4) – Video: a Member of Parliament, Karina Adsbøl, addresses her concerns to the Minister of Health, mentioning the deformities at the mink farm and the menstruation problems at the garden center:https://wcfn.org/documents/windfarms-affect-menstruation-danish-parliament/


(5) – Waubra Foundation:http://waubrafoundation.org.au/




X X X




Note: if an ad appears below, it’s from WordPress, not from WCFN. WordPress is free of charge, but publicity is how they recoup their costs. We regret that our budget does not permit us to afford an ad-free webpage.


Responses

  1. […] Denmark – wind turbines disrupt MENSTRUATION | World Council for Nature They will eventually have to deal with the health problems and that will hit wind profits and our pockets as a consequence. Sign in or Register Now to reply […]

  2. Thanks to WCFN, for reporting inconvenient news that the world media are hiding from the public – except for the Danish press.

    Thanks to the Danish press, to the two papers at least that have shown integrity in reporting.

    SHAME on the media in the other countries!
    What does that tell us about them?

    This news is enormously important for the health of thousands, perhaps millions of people over time in most parts of the world.

  3. In Australia hens have been reported to lay yolk-less eggs, then stop laying altogether near the mega-watt machines.

  4. […] World Council for Nature συσχετίζει ευθέως τη συμπεριφορά των αρμοδίων για τις ανεμογεννήτριες […]

  5. […] Then, female employees from a garden center close to a wind farm left their jobs, as they were experiencing irregularities in their ovulation cycles: https://wcfn.org/2014/07/10/denmark-wind-turbines-disrupt-menstruation/ […]

  6. […] evidence DID come up that they may have similar effects in human populations: <a href="WIND TURBINES DISRUPT MENSTRUATION“> […]

  7. […] https://wcfn.org/2014/07/10/denmark-wind-turbines-disrupt-menstruation ↩ […]

  8. Reblogged this on How Green Is This.

  9. […] Source: Wind turbine infrasound affects OVULATION (Denmark) […]

  10. Reblogged this on Patti Kellar and commented:
    Pay attention to your symptoms, especially Huron County folk who have an opportunity through the Huron County Health Unit to engage in an investigation as to whether or not Industrial Wind Turbines are a health hazard.
    There is no doubt in my mind but we have to prove it to the powers that be through very few avenues. This is a first in Ontario.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: